Toyota or Tesla – digital frugal vs digital native

(Please note this is an automated translation).

Toyota, a model for productivity.

Toyota has long been considered a model in terms of productivity, mainly thanks to its Toyota Production System (TPS), which emphasizes « lean » manufacturing, continuous improvement (Kaizen), and a strong focus on efficiency. Their approach has always been marked by frugality, simplicity, and a minimalist approach to processes, using only necessary resources and focusing on waste reduction.
Even though many companies are now adopting large-scale digitalization, Toyota has been more cautious and selective in integrating digital technologies. This cautious approach aligns with their philosophy of avoiding overproduction, over-engineering, or unnecessary complexity – fundamental principles of « lean » production. Toyota’s preference for measured technological adoption ensures that digital solutions are in line with their core objectives and are not simply adopted due to trend-following.

Toyota facing « neo-industrial » competitors from the digital world
Contrary to what is sometimes caricatured, the Toyota model is not « anti-digital » but rather « frugal and human-centered. » It is characterized by the following elements:

  1. Selective digital adoption of proven solutions: Rather than rushing into widespread digitalization, Toyota adopts a more pragmatic approach: deploying technologies that bring proven value in proven cases, such as robots, automation, and artificial intelligence (AI), where these technologies contribute to production goals. For example, Toyota has adopted collaborative robots (cobots) to assist human workers, but not to completely replace them.
  2. A human-centered approach: Toyota emphasizes the importance of people-driven processes and human creativity, and verifying that processes remain simple and manageable for the operators who implement them. The Toyota Production System is a system where machines help humans, not the other way around. « This implementation of kaizen on work is the bedrock of jidoka. It doesn’t matter how much machines, robots, or IT excel; they can’t evolve any further on their own. Only humans can implement kaizen for the sake of evolution. »
  3. Frugality and environmental impact: Toyota’s frugality is not just about cost reduction, but also about environmental impact. Digital solutions are closely examined for their environmental impact and ability to reduce waste. For example, Toyota has implemented energy management solutions in its factories to minimize carbon footprint and save energy, while remaining at the forefront of productivity.
  4. Avoiding risks related to uncontrolled technological disruptions: While some more digitalized competitors may achieve greater speed or agility in certain processes, Toyota’s chosen approach is to avoid common pitfalls of digitalization, such as over-reliance on automation or unnecessary system complexity. Their focus on continuous improvement (Kaizen) helps them stay ahead without needing to fully adopt the « all-digital » mindset of competitors like Tesla or Volkswagen.

While this approach has so far yielded excellent long-term results, the debate between Toyota’s « frugal and incremental » approach and Tesla’s more « technological and radical » approach is regularly reopened – most recently regarding Tesla’s « gigacasting » approach, for which we still lack hindsight to know if this approach will be enough to overturn the Toyota model.

To learn more:

  1. The basics of the Toyota Production System: https://global.toyota/en/company/vision-and-philosophy/production-system/
  2. Robot adoption at Toyota: https://www.robots.com/articles/how-toyota-uses-automation-to-improve-processes
  3. Toyota facing the « gigacasting » challenge: https://www.ft.com/content/08048b42-ce72-4b64-9e0e-d15fbc98a9da
À propos

Dédié à l'analyse des questions économiques, sociales et environnementales de long terme, L'Observatoire du Long Terme se fixe pour objectif de donner davantage de visibilité à ces enjeux dans le débat public. Dans ce contexte, il donne la parole à des contributeurs variés, avec pour seul critère le caractère étayé des arguments présentés.

L'Observatoire est indépendant, ne reçoit aucune aide financière et repose sur le volontariat de ses contributeurs, de son bureau, présidé par Vincent Champain et Bruno Fuchs.

Sur le même sujet

LAISSER UN COMMENTAIRE

S'il vous plaît entrez votre commentaire!
S'il vous plaît entrez votre nom ici

Article précédent
Article suivant

Du même auteur

Toyota : is less digital better ?

Toyota, un modèle de productivité. Toyota a longtemps été considéré comme un modèle en matière de productivité, principalement grâce à son Toyota Production System (TPS),...

Moins de plombiers, plus d’architectes

Alexandre Grothendieck, l’un des esprits les plus brillants du 20e siècle, résumait ainsi l’opposition entre l’amélioration à la marge et les changements plus radicaux...

Votez pour le stratége numérique de l’année !

Vincent Champain est nominé comme CIO stratège de l'année par CIO Online. Si vous suivez ce blog et appréciez son travail sur les sujets...

Ecart France – Etats-Unis : les 3 « D »

Les statistiques de produit intérieur brut (PIB) semblent sans appel : ramené à une même monnaie – le dollar - la richesse produite aux États-Unis...